|
|
Post by TheDavii on Sept 6, 2019 11:45:13 GMT -5
These cards allow purchase of a Senator Bunny Modifier card for the fixed price of 5 Dolla: - OEOH Flying Purple Bunny Eater (1129; Deck= Caramel; Run; Aggressive) OEOH Flying Purple Bunny Eater may be used once by a player to purchase a Violet item from any opponent for 5 Dolla: a Violet bunny, a Violet Pawn or a Whiner Senator Bunny Modifier card.
- Yellow-Bellied Sapsucker (1134; Deck= Caramel; Run; Aggressive) Yellow-Bellied Sapsucker may be used once by a player to purchase a Yellow item from any opponent for 5 Dolla: a Yellow bunny, a Yellow Pawn or a Shiner Senator Bunny Modifier Card.
Is that purchase forced or can the owner of the Senator refuse the sale?
I am thinking it is forced and the owner (of any of the items) cannot refuse the sale because: 1) the price is fixed and not negotiated; and 2) the card allows the removal and repositioning of a Senator Bunny Modifier, which is otherwise not allowed; 3) the cards say "may" because such items may not be in play.
|
|
|
|
Post by mahobear8 on Sept 6, 2019 21:57:56 GMT -5
These cards allow purchase of a Senator Bunny Modifier card for the fixed price of 5 Dolla: - OEOH Flying Purple Bunny Eater (1129; Deck= Caramel; Run; Aggressive) OEOH Flying Purple Bunny Eater may be used once by a player to purchase a Violet item from any opponent for 5 Dolla: a Violet bunny, a Violet Pawn or a Whiner Senator Bunny Modifier card.
- Yellow-Bellied Sapsucker (1134; Deck= Caramel; Run; Aggressive) Yellow-Bellied Sapsucker may be used once by a player to purchase a Yellow item from any opponent for 5 Dolla: a Yellow bunny, a Yellow Pawn or a Shiner Senator Bunny Modifier Card.
Is that purchase forced or can the owner of the Senator refuse the sale?
I am thinking it is forced and the owner (of any of the items) cannot refuse the sale because: 1) the price is fixed and not negotiated; and 2) the card allows the removal and repositioning of a Senator Bunny Modifier, which is otherwise not allowed; 3) the cards say "may" because such items may not be in play.
Definitely forced, unless of course the opponent has a law enforcement bunny, then they could presumably refuse the sale (treating it as "traded without consent") |
|
|
|
Post by tastypastry on Jan 27, 2020 23:57:55 GMT -5
Agreed, forced. Same would apply in Red Light District imo. That is, for the original question.
I'm not sure about the above reply though. I think that a true definition of what 'saved objects' mean would really help. IMO, a bunny in the bunny circle, or a modifier, is not a saved object - but I have a different thread on that...
|
|
