|
|
Post by Jason Pease on Oct 31, 2004 15:47:14 GMT -5
The Djarnak: "May be placed between any two adjacent players and prevents each from using any aggressive cards (cards with a pink box) against each other."
Can a player use an 'Everyone Feed a Bunny' card? Even though it's not played directly on your adjacent player, it still makes them feed their bunny. What do you guys think?
|
|
cdweller0
Seaman Apprentice
Up To No Good
Posts: 36
|
Post by cdweller0 on Oct 31, 2004 17:52:29 GMT -5
Has to be a house rules situation for now, I suppose. I'd get a consensus from those you play with.
In my house, you certainly can play it on someone you're allowed to and all must satisfy the munchies. The Djarnak prevents direct attack in my eyes. So ranged weapons and the like can still harm the one you can't attack (oops! *snicker*).
|
|
cdweller0
Seaman Apprentice
Up To No Good
Posts: 36
|
Post by cdweller0 on Oct 31, 2004 18:28:01 GMT -5
Well, maybe not a house rule after all. From the KB.com site (and yours =):
Though feeding is not a weapon, I say why not? Same concept in my eyes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Pease on Oct 31, 2004 19:20:24 GMT -5
Yes, I would say that an 'Everyone Feed a Bunny' is an indirect card that doesn't have to be played directly on the players bunnies. So I say YES! And welcome cdweller0!  Jason |
|
cdweller0
Seaman Apprentice
Up To No Good
Posts: 36
|
Post by cdweller0 on Oct 31, 2004 20:13:56 GMT -5
Thanks for the welcome, Jason. I found your site while I was compiling my House Rules into printed form for my group. This way we can keep track of them all. Your site was a big help, good work! |
|
|
|
Post by karmaween on Nov 1, 2004 13:03:13 GMT -5
yes i would have to go with the "indirect" ruling on this one as well
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimbo on Nov 5, 2004 20:16:23 GMT -5
What is the official pronouciation of Djarnak anyway?
I've always thought the "D" was silent and it would be pronouced Jarnak.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Pease on Nov 6, 2004 0:28:04 GMT -5
Not sure of the pronunciation but we always say 'De-jar-nak' at our house.
I just got done playing an entire game with the Djarnak present. My wife and I both had 10+ bunnies down at the end.
Another question, can a player use HEMP against the Beyea Aliens if the bunnies being held are the opponents? Technically, you're attaking the aliens, not the bunny.
Same question with Poverty Poker and Mystery Urn.
|
|
cdweller0
Seaman Apprentice
Up To No Good
Posts: 36
|
Post by cdweller0 on Nov 6, 2004 10:20:50 GMT -5
I'd guess gambling would be ok, but I don't think so on HEMP. Do you think you could abduct a bunny protected by the Djarnak? Technically, it's not you attacking, it's the aliens  The intent of HEMP is always to harm one specific person, and I think that goes against the intent of the Djarnak. (I say Jarnak too, soft J as in 'deja vu' if it matters) |
|
|
|
Post by TILADX on Nov 20, 2004 20:10:20 GMT -5
I'd guess gambling would be ok, but I don't think so on HEMP. Do you think you could abduct a bunny protected by the Djarnak? Technically, it's not you attacking, it's the aliens The intent of HEMP is always to harm one specific person, and I think that goes against the intent of the Djarnak. (I say Jarnak too, soft J as in 'deja vu' if it matters) You as the player are still playing the card. Area 51 and the Mothership are aggressive cards, therefore if the Djarnak is between you and another player, you cannot have one of his/her bunnies abducted. |
|
|
|
Post by Jason Pease on Nov 20, 2004 21:40:48 GMT -5
You as the player are still playing the card. Area 51 and the Mothership are aggressive cards, therefore if the Djarnak is between you and another player, you cannot have one of his/her bunnies abducted. Unless the bunny was abducted *before* the Djarnak was played. |
|
The intent of HEMP is always to harm one specific person, and I think that goes against the intent of the Djarnak.