|
Post by waitreally on Jun 27, 2012 13:11:24 GMT -5
The Blue Bunny bits state:
Does that mean that the first card has to be the bunny that completes a triplet? What if that top card is Supplies Surprise, which results in you getting a bunny and completing a triplet? Can you then play a second card during that same turn?
|
|
|
Post by TheDavii on Jun 27, 2012 13:46:19 GMT -5
The Blue Bunny bits state: Does that mean that the first card has to be the bunny that completes a triplet? What if that top card is Supplies Surprise, which results in you getting a bunny and completing a triplet? Can you then play a second card during that same turn? No, that's the wrong inference. During a player's turn, if a "triplet is established" (doesn't matter how, doesn't have to be a Bunny Triplet, but could be a Zodiac Triplet, pawn purchase, etc.), then immediately the player can start playing two cards per turn by playing an additional card. So, to your last question, yes, a player can then play a second card during that same turn.
|
|
|
Post by waitreally on Jun 27, 2012 16:01:17 GMT -5
Then why have the line "with the first card"? Why not just say, "If the Bunny Triplet is established during a player's turn, then they may play a second card during that same turn."
|
|
|
Post by TheDavii on Jun 27, 2012 22:02:49 GMT -5
Then why have the line "with the first card"? Why not just say, "If the Bunny Triplet is established during a player's turn, then they may play a second card during that same turn." You'll have to ask Jeff. I didn't write it. I am only trying to explain what was written since it seemed to be confusing to you.
|
|
|
Post by waitreally on Jun 28, 2012 13:56:49 GMT -5
I appreciate it. We've always played it that if you can establish the triplet with the first card in some way (either you flip a bunny, or you win a bunny with Supplies Surprise, etc.) then you're good to play a second. But if you trade a bunny or use a saved Run Transformer or something, then it doesn't count. But I'm now thinking that this is probably too literal of an interpretation.
|
|