redgleefulbunny
Seaman Apprentice
shp(o~-180;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~0;; p~20,11;; )
Posts: 44
|
Post by redgleefulbunny on Apr 8, 2008 11:21:38 GMT -5
name: SPOOOOOOOON!
type: run
picture: red sinister holding a sthingy in the air
effect: this war cry strikes feart into the hearts of all bunnies in the bunny circle and nobody can play agressive cards this round
|
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Apr 8, 2008 15:59:35 GMT -5
I hate when someone strikes feart into my bunnies' hearts...
|
|
|
|
Post by ricdude on Apr 9, 2008 14:50:01 GMT -5
Is Arthur going to be pictured on the card, shaking his head in dismay?
|
|
redgleefulbunny
Seaman Apprentice
shp(o~-180;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~0;; p~20,11;; )
Posts: 44
|
Post by redgleefulbunny on Apr 9, 2008 19:37:09 GMT -5
that's a great Idea! yay obscure references!
|
|
|
|
Post by teemothy on Apr 11, 2008 0:27:56 GMT -5
This is a good idea- also shozz came up with the idea of having cards that can only be played without a bunny, the opposite of aggressive cards.
|
|
|
|
Post by hareball on Apr 26, 2008 8:28:38 GMT -5
I like it because it slows the carnage creation.
|
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Apr 26, 2008 11:25:22 GMT -5
This is a good idea- also shozz came up with the idea of having cards that can only be played without a bunny, the opposite of aggressive cards. where was this idea? that sounds interesting, anti-aggressive cards... you could do like a green box instead of pink or white... I like it... |
|
|
|
Post by TheDavii on Apr 26, 2008 16:14:02 GMT -5
This is a good idea- also shozz came up with the idea of having cards that can only be played without a bunny, the opposite of aggressive cards. where was this idea? that sounds interesting, anti-aggressive cards... you could do like a green box instead of pink or white... I like it... Good idea! We can make this a group effort. How about this (almost exactly the same size as the Pink Box in the KillerBunnies.com web site and a little cleaner to boot):  |
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Apr 26, 2008 17:15:00 GMT -5
awesome, now what kind of cards would work without a bunny?...
|
|
|
|
Post by TheDavii on Apr 27, 2008 22:49:38 GMT -5
awesome, now what kind of cards would work without a bunny?... How about a class or category of cards that require a player bestow "goodness" on opponents? Without a bunny, these non-aggressive cards would require that player puts them only on opponents' bunnies (as additions). Maybe call them "Friendly" cards? Friendly cards might be things like clover, or items that increase weapons, but only if the opponent uses them on somebody besides the player? |
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Apr 28, 2008 15:35:26 GMT -5
ok, but how would this benefit anyone?...
|
|
|
|
Post by TheDavii on Apr 28, 2008 18:30:35 GMT -5
I was trying to get the ball rolling.
Such an idea would encourage your "friends" to attack others with these newly-developed capabilities because they couldn't attack you.
Do you have an alternative suggestion?
|
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Apr 28, 2008 21:11:45 GMT -5
I'm just trying to keep the ball rolling...
I think it would be good if the card could somehow benefit the player as well as the person the player hands it to...
|
|
|
|
Post by TheDavii on Apr 29, 2008 6:05:47 GMT -5
Well, the "benefit" is indirect, as the opponent may not play the bunny (with addition) against player. So player benefits (1) by having selected opponent attack other opponents; and (2) by not being attacked himself.
Not enough?
|
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Apr 29, 2008 18:38:56 GMT -5
it kinda bugs me but I can't figure out why...
I understand that some people might not attack you because you played a friendly on them, but others wouldn't think twice if it served them...
|
|
