|
|
Post by fifisdead on Feb 1, 2007 14:19:44 GMT -5
I had kind of a half-baked idea today in class that I thought could be developed, the only name I could think of was "neutral party", though I was trying to think of something about Apathy or something... suggestion?.
No harm can come to the player who plays this, but they can't harm others for three rounds, violators will lose a carrot for each time they neglect the card
it seems like it could be a good card, especially to weed out any cards that people may have told you are coming for you, or something. I don't know, tell me what you think
|
|
|
|
Post by bunnyfromthefuture on Feb 1, 2007 16:54:00 GMT -5
 As you can see, I haven't done the text, for I don't have Enviro. I'd appreciate it if someone who had Enviro would. And I'm aware that it's not a bunny. *UPDATE: Enviroed up! Thanks, guys!* *UPDATE 2: Now he's wearing the lederhosen rather than standing behind it.* |
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Feb 1, 2007 16:59:04 GMT -5
That's pretty funny bftf
here's the link to the enviro font
"http://solosong.net/masq.html "
I'll see if I can improve on the card when I get home
|
|
|
|
Post by bunnyfromthefuture on Feb 1, 2007 18:13:21 GMT -5
Thanks for the link.
|
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Feb 1, 2007 23:17:30 GMT -5
no problem
|
|
|
|
Post by squidtaco on Feb 2, 2007 0:10:28 GMT -5
Seems a little similar to bunny from the future with a small twist.
|
|
Tyberius
Lieutenant
Zoo Pawn Wrangler
shp(o~-6076;; b~1;; i~0;; u~1;; s~1;; a~1;; c~993300;; p~11,8,19,20,2,23,24,21;; )
Posts: 2,554
|
Post by Tyberius on Feb 2, 2007 6:51:02 GMT -5
Neat idea. Does the violator only lose once carrot per card? (Is it the same penalty to play the Whisk as it is Necro Fasci ?)
|
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Feb 2, 2007 10:52:18 GMT -5
that's why it was still a half-baked idea, I was trying to think of how to vary punishment and how to write that in the description.
Any suggestions?
|
|
Tyberius
Lieutenant
Zoo Pawn Wrangler
shp(o~-6076;; b~1;; i~0;; u~1;; s~1;; a~1;; c~993300;; p~11,8,19,20,2,23,24,21;; )
Posts: 2,554
|
Post by Tyberius on Feb 2, 2007 12:08:04 GMT -5
Maybe lose a carrot for each bunny attacked?
It has some hard considerations, too.
Player C is neutral
If player A attacks player B with Psychic waves, and Player B plays some defense cards, then player C is now the target. Who is responsible, A or B?
Player C is neutral
If player A attacks player B's Red Sinister with a splash weapon. Red Sinister survives and bounces it back. Player C takes splash damage from the rebound on A. Who is responsible, A or B?
I still love the card, tho.
|
|
|
|
Post by bunnyfromthefuture on Feb 2, 2007 12:58:24 GMT -5
I think it should be "any ATTEMPT to violate" - the attack is automatically a dud.
I reckon in both case's it's A's 'fault' (he played the weapon).
For RRRs, I think they should just skip Switzerland, no-one losing anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Feb 2, 2007 13:01:03 GMT -5
I think it should be "any ATTEMPT to violate" - the attack is automatically a dud. I reckon in both case's it's A's 'fault' (he played the weapon). For RRRs, I think they should just skip Switzerland, no-one losing anything. I was just about to post almost the exact same thing, and I was already thinking RRRs would just skip, but it should be the choice of the person who launched it, so they could say, I'll lose a carrot to attack your red timid but I'll let it skip all the others |
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Feb 2, 2007 14:36:55 GMT -5
I came up with a name I like better, Neutrality
Actually I was thinking and I want the card to not stop harm, just punish it so anyone can do harm, but they will suffer the consequences so it would be like in reality, a neutral person isn't unharmable, they just shouldn't be harmed. I was thinking the text should be something like:
The Player can't harm opponents for three rounds, if opponents try to harm this player they will lose a carrot for each circumstance brought upon the player.
This way, they might rethink playing any type of card they could potentially harm the player of the card.
What does everybody think of the change of direction?
|
|
trebor1782
Seaman Apprentice
shp(o~-170;; b~0;; i~0;; u~0;; s~1;; a~0;; p~11;; )
Posts: 44
|
Post by trebor1782 on Feb 2, 2007 16:08:23 GMT -5
That sounds like a pretty good idea...
All you need is Archbunny Ferdinand, and you're all set!
...
I think that was a history joke... I need to get out more
|
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Feb 2, 2007 17:21:56 GMT -5
well if we're going with history jokes, we could call the card armistice or cease fire, actually... those are not too shabby...
|
|
|
|
Post by fifisdead on Feb 3, 2007 23:33:24 GMT -5
I did the card, a quick job though, so it's nothing too special.  |
|
