|
|
Post by Jason Pease on Jul 26, 2005 19:43:02 GMT -5
Crash Test Bunny -- Very Special
"May be immediately placed anywhere in the bunny circle, but does not count as any players bunny. This bunny may be destroyed using any weapon. Because the bunny isn't alive, it cannot defend itself and is immediately discarded. "
Picture: Bunny with those circles on it's temples.
It's a bunny that can be used as a cushion from splash damage or to stall a RRR.
|
|
whitbunny
Lieutenant
Hockey Expert
shp(o~20171;; b~1;; i~1;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~2,0,3,6,4,5,1,7,21;; )
Posts: 2,131
|
Post by whitbunny on Jul 26, 2005 20:18:21 GMT -5
I like it! There needs to be some way to get rid of it though...but I can't figure out how.
|
|
|
|
Post by HareOfTheDog on Jul 26, 2005 22:41:18 GMT -5
Maybe it "dies" when the splash weapon is used. It serves its purpose and then is gone.
"All we are is dust in the (Plutonium nuclear fallout) wind"
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeffro on Jul 27, 2005 6:21:16 GMT -5
This is a great idea!... and a great play on words what with the name and all... My initial thought though is that if it's just a Run card that serves as a buffer once, then it's just like a regular bunny except you can't play aggressive cards. How about making it a special, so if it's played from your hand it comes down in the bunny circle (quicker than a regular bunny) OR make it last for more than a few weapons... or maybe weapons up to a certain level?... (both might be a bit too powerful... but hey!... I can already picture it in the "Fan Based" Booster deck  ) |
|
Tyberius
Lieutenant
Zoo Pawn Wrangler
shp(o~-6076;; b~1;; i~0;; u~1;; s~1;; a~1;; c~993300;; p~11,8,19,20,2,23,24,21;; )
Posts: 2,554
|
Post by Tyberius on Jul 27, 2005 8:30:53 GMT -5
It still wouldn't stall Cyber. From the V3 rules, Cyber skips what it knows it can't kill.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeffro on Jul 27, 2005 12:34:17 GMT -5
Good catch, ty. Maybe, though, there's a special rule that says CB needs to hit CTB at least once....?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Pease on Jul 27, 2005 14:48:48 GMT -5
Jeffro is absolutely right, as a run card, it's like a souped-down bunny. I'll change it to a Special card that can be placed down immediately.
Heck, you know what, this would be an excellent VS card. You could use it as a 'buffer-bunny' when someone plays a big weapon on you. You could use it to break the fingercuffs.
Okay, I updated the description, tell me it's better.
|
|
whitbunny
Lieutenant
Hockey Expert
shp(o~20171;; b~1;; i~1;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~2,0,3,6,4,5,1,7,21;; )
Posts: 2,131
|
Post by whitbunny on Jul 27, 2005 16:15:05 GMT -5
Better. But I kind of liked the idea of him being able to withstand lots of hits. How about something like if the total damage done to him exceeds 25, then he gets discarded?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jason Pease on Jul 27, 2005 19:10:26 GMT -5
Better. But I kind of liked the idea of him being able to withstand lots of hits. How about something like if the total damage done to him exceeds 25, then he gets discarded? Well, I just wanted him to be a speed bump or a road block. I don't like powerful cards. |
|
whitbunny
Lieutenant
Hockey Expert
shp(o~20171;; b~1;; i~1;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~2,0,3,6,4,5,1,7,21;; )
Posts: 2,131
|
Post by whitbunny on Jul 27, 2005 21:38:47 GMT -5
Better. But I kind of liked the idea of him being able to withstand lots of hits. How about something like if the total damage done to him exceeds 25, then he gets discarded? Well, I just wanted him to be a speed bump or a road block. I don't like powerful cards. But it's such a good name - it should be powerful. But your way is good too. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeffro on Jul 28, 2005 7:28:56 GMT -5
Much better. And I absolutely love the picture idea. Maybe it could get a little more clout by putting the CTB in a DeLorean....?
|
|
Tyberius
Lieutenant
Zoo Pawn Wrangler
shp(o~-6076;; b~1;; i~0;; u~1;; s~1;; a~1;; c~993300;; p~11,8,19,20,2,23,24,21;; )
Posts: 2,554
|
Post by Tyberius on Jul 28, 2005 7:36:58 GMT -5
or a Fiat......
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeffro on Mar 21, 2006 21:38:07 GMT -5
|
|
whitbunny
Lieutenant
Hockey Expert
shp(o~20171;; b~1;; i~1;; u~0;; s~1;; a~1;; p~2,0,3,6,4,5,1,7,21;; )
Posts: 2,131
|
Post by whitbunny on Mar 21, 2006 21:52:17 GMT -5
I'd probably go with the first one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vadehare on Mar 21, 2006 23:20:09 GMT -5
Yeah, the first one rocks. I like the "x" eyes.
|
|
)
